Paper Title: Women and Nibbana: An Analysis of Early Buddhist
Texts
Abstract
Whether the early Buddhism was biased in
favour of bhikkhus over bhikkhunis and men over women is the
subject of this study. Pali Buddhist texts, i.e., Vinaya Pitaka, Anguttara Nikaya, Majjhima Nikaya and selected
discourses from Samyutta Nikaya present
a mixed basket of egalitarian and non-egalitarian, and soteriologically
inclusive and androgynous Buddhist worldviews. Despite the institutional
androcentrism and ascetic misogyny these texts teach that the Buddha gave
dhammas (teachings) to all human beings irrespective of their caste and gender,
and also taught that women are equally capable of realising the fruit of
stream-attainment (sotapanna),
once-returning (sakadagami),
non-returning (anagami) and perfection
(arahant). The realisation of
perfection (arahant) is nibbana or complete absence of dukkha, which is
considered within Buddhist tradition as the highest goal attainable by personal
efforts by both men and women. The Theragatha
and Therigatha narrate the stories of
Buddhist men and women who realized perfection during the life and after the
Buddha. These texts and the Buddhist teachings such as paticcasamuppada,
Anicca, Anatta and Dukkha are
interpreted to show that theoretically there is no difference between men and
women as both are association of five aggregates, which is not identical with
male or female, though because of the cultural influence there are also
evidence for discrimination against women.
Abhinav Anand is a Research Scholar at the Department of
Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian School of Mines, Dhanbad, India. He
completed Bachelor of Arts and Master of Arts from University of Delhi. His
areas of interest are Buddhist Literature, Philosophy and Ethics, Indian
Literature, Philosophy, Religious and Culture Studies.

No comments:
Post a Comment